Talk:Ars Magica Open Content Conversion Style Guide: Difference between revisions
(→Navboxes: new section) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
[[User:NeilNjae]] and [[User:Audrey_Azura]] thanks for <nowiki>{{Template:Formula template}}</nowiki>! I think standard templates are incredibly useful. | [[User:NeilNjae]] and [[User:Audrey_Azura]] thanks for <nowiki>{{Template:Formula template}}</nowiki>! I think standard templates are incredibly useful. | ||
I don't think we should focus on recreating the printed book layout so much. I've tried a few different things in [[Ars Magica 5E Standard Edition, Chapter Nine: Spells|Spells]], none seem to really work well. | I don't think we should focus on recreating the printed book layout so much. I've tried a few different things in [[Ars Magica 5E Standard Edition, Chapter Nine: Spells|Spells]], none seem to really work well. You can see the template and my attempt here [[Ars_Magica_5E_Standard_Edition,_Chapter_Nine:_Spells#Level_Guidelines]] for some of the complexities. | ||
My concerns | My concerns | ||
Revision as of 10:23, 9 November 2024
Formula template
User:NeilNjae and User:Audrey_Azura thanks for {{Template:Formula template}}! I think standard templates are incredibly useful.
I don't think we should focus on recreating the printed book layout so much. I've tried a few different things in Spells, none seem to really work well. You can see the template and my attempt here Ars_Magica_5E_Standard_Edition,_Chapter_Nine:_Spells#Level_Guidelines for some of the complexities.
My concerns
- We don't have the same column constraints as the text, so I think we should not stack the two parts, and have them horizontally next to each other.
- I really don't think both parts should be bold, and I'm going to change this so the 2nd part isn't bold.
- We need an anchor in the template so the Appendix II entries can link to it.
- It's probably too soon to be thinking about text decoration, but being in a template it's easy to change, very cool.
Mataglap (talk) 10:12, 9 November 2024 (MST)
I've asked the admins about other Mediawiki extensions and modules, and they responded that they are looking at Navbox and its dependencies. In the meantime, what are everyone's thoughts about {{ArMOLsimplenav}}? Mataglap (talk) 10:15, 9 November 2024 (MST)