Talk:Ars Magica Open Content Conversion Style Guide: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(→Navboxes: new section) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
# It's probably too soon to be thinking about text decoration, but being in a template it's easy to change, very cool. | # It's probably too soon to be thinking about text decoration, but being in a template it's easy to change, very cool. | ||
[[User:Mataglap|Mataglap]] ([[User talk:Mataglap|talk]]) 10:12, 9 November 2024 (MST) | [[User:Mataglap|Mataglap]] ([[User talk:Mataglap|talk]]) 10:12, 9 November 2024 (MST) | ||
== Navboxes == | |||
I've asked the admins about other Mediawiki extensions and modules, and they responded that they are looking at Navbox and its dependencies. In the meantime, what are everyone's thoughts about <nowiki>{{ArMOLsimplenav}}</nowiki>? | |||
[[User:Mataglap|Mataglap]] ([[User talk:Mataglap|talk]]) 10:15, 9 November 2024 (MST) | |||
Revision as of 10:15, 9 November 2024
Formula template
User:NeilNjae and User:Audrey_Azura thanks for {{Template:Formula template}}! I think standard templates are incredibly useful.
I don't think we should focus on recreating the printed book layout so much. I've tried a few different things in Spells, none seem to really work well.
My concerns
- We don't have the same column constraints as the text, so I think we should not stack the two parts, and have them horizontally next to each other.
- I really don't think both parts should be bold, and I'm going to change this so the 2nd part isn't bold.
- We need an anchor in the template so the Appendix II entries can link to it.
- It's probably too soon to be thinking about text decoration, but being in a template it's easy to change, very cool.
Mataglap (talk) 10:12, 9 November 2024 (MST)
I've asked the admins about other Mediawiki extensions and modules, and they responded that they are looking at Navbox and its dependencies. In the meantime, what are everyone's thoughts about {{ArMOLsimplenav}}? Mataglap (talk) 10:15, 9 November 2024 (MST)