Talk:Welcome to Ars Magica: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(Proposal to re-arrange content between this and Ars Magica) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
: I can see the "Ars Magica" page expanded with a more in-depth explanation of Ars Magica, that would touch on many issues raised in the "Welcome to Ars Magica" page. However, that would still be a very different article from a primer. I can also see the primer incorporated into the main "Ars Magica" text and the "Welcome to Ars Magica" page deleted, but that would only be confusing for most readers in my opinion. I think it's best to leave a link to the "Welcome to Ars Magica" page on the "Ars Magica" page, as I've done. At least - that was my thought process. [[User:Yair|Yair]] 19:42, 20 August 2012 (MDT) | : I can see the "Ars Magica" page expanded with a more in-depth explanation of Ars Magica, that would touch on many issues raised in the "Welcome to Ars Magica" page. However, that would still be a very different article from a primer. I can also see the primer incorporated into the main "Ars Magica" text and the "Welcome to Ars Magica" page deleted, but that would only be confusing for most readers in my opinion. I think it's best to leave a link to the "Welcome to Ars Magica" page on the "Ars Magica" page, as I've done. At least - that was my thought process. [[User:Yair|Yair]] 19:42, 20 August 2012 (MDT) | ||
:: Having thought about this a bit more, I think we're in agreement that there's a need for two separate pages: one that's an overview that describes the major features of the game, and another that's an introduction to how to get started actually playing it. At this time, this page serves a mix of those purposes. So I would propose moving the paragraphs that describe the game onto the "Ars Magica" page, and letting "Welcome to Ars Magica" be the introduction to the game. Also, before I forget, we need to get CJ's PowerPoint slides linked to the "Welcome" page. |
Revision as of 05:57, 9 September 2012
I'm not sure I understand why this page is separate from Ars Magica. Would it make sense to combine them?
- Well, this page is intended to be a primer for Ars Magica, a reading guide and companion to the core rulebook to help ease new players into the game. This is quite a different role from the standard "Ars Magica" page, which in my opinion should include general information about Ars Magica, including some details about its history, publisher, and so on, for the casual viewer. I think these goals are best served by having two distinct texts, so that the two pages are justified.
- I can see the "Ars Magica" page expanded with a more in-depth explanation of Ars Magica, that would touch on many issues raised in the "Welcome to Ars Magica" page. However, that would still be a very different article from a primer. I can also see the primer incorporated into the main "Ars Magica" text and the "Welcome to Ars Magica" page deleted, but that would only be confusing for most readers in my opinion. I think it's best to leave a link to the "Welcome to Ars Magica" page on the "Ars Magica" page, as I've done. At least - that was my thought process. Yair 19:42, 20 August 2012 (MDT)
- Having thought about this a bit more, I think we're in agreement that there's a need for two separate pages: one that's an overview that describes the major features of the game, and another that's an introduction to how to get started actually playing it. At this time, this page serves a mix of those purposes. So I would propose moving the paragraphs that describe the game onto the "Ars Magica" page, and letting "Welcome to Ars Magica" be the introduction to the game. Also, before I forget, we need to get CJ's PowerPoint slides linked to the "Welcome" page.