Talk:Ars Magica Open Content Conversion Style Guide: Difference between revisions
Audrey Azura (talk | contribs) |
Audrey Azura (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
# It's probably too soon to be thinking about text decoration, but being in a template it's easy to change, very cool. | # It's probably too soon to be thinking about text decoration, but being in a template it's easy to change, very cool. | ||
[[User:Mataglap|Mataglap]] ([[User talk:Mataglap|talk]]) 10:12, 9 November 2024 (MST) | [[User:Mataglap|Mataglap]] ([[User talk:Mataglap|talk]]) 10:12, 9 November 2024 (MST) | ||
I created a template for Mystery Initiations [[Template:ArMMysteryInitiation]]. I took example on the option I thought was the best from [[User: Mataglap]] test on spells and formula. Feel free to modify and try new things ^^. | |||
== Navboxes == | == Navboxes == |
Revision as of 14:03, 18 November 2024
Formula template
User:NeilNjae and User:Audrey_Azura thanks for {{Template:Formula template}}! I think standard templates are incredibly useful.
I don't think we should focus on recreating the printed book layout so much. I've tried a few different things in Spells, none seem to really work well. You can see the template and my attempt here Ars_Magica_5E_Standard_Edition,_Chapter_Nine:_Spells#Level_Guidelines for some of the complexities.
My concerns
- We don't have the same column constraints as the text, so I think we should not stack the two parts, and have them horizontally next to each other.
- I really don't think both parts should be bold, and I'm going to change this so the 2nd part isn't bold.
- We need an anchor in the template so the Appendix II entries can link to it.
- It's probably too soon to be thinking about text decoration, but being in a template it's easy to change, very cool.
Mataglap (talk) 10:12, 9 November 2024 (MST)
I created a template for Mystery Initiations Template:ArMMysteryInitiation. I took example on the option I thought was the best from User: Mataglap test on spells and formula. Feel free to modify and try new things ^^.
I've asked the admins about other Mediawiki extensions and modules, and they responded that they are looking at Navbox and its dependencies. In the meantime, what are everyone's thoughts about {{ArMOLsimplenav}}? Mataglap (talk) 10:15, 9 November 2024 (MST) The admins have installed a bunch of stuff, including Navbox, thank you!
{{ArsMnavbox}}
Mataglap (talk) 21:41, 10 November 2024 (MST)
- I am not used at all to use Navbox (it is my first time being involved heavily in a wiki project ^^'), so sorry for probably the very basic questions, but I was wondering:
- Should I use this generic, OL content navbox on all content?
- Should we make specific navbox for each books?
- --Audrey Azura (talk) 13:06, 18 November 2024 (MST)
Sidebars
What should be done about sidebars? So far, I've been able to easily incorporate the sidebars into the main doc for Chapter 9 Spells. Most of the time this has actually been better, since the sidebar content in Ch. 9 can be rather far from its related content. Mataglap (talk) 10:29, 9 November 2024 (MST)
- In most cases, I've added them as subsections in the section where they belong. Quite a few of the boxes seem to be there to help with the layout rather than being genuine asides to the main text.
- NeilNjae (talk) 06:30, 15 November 2024 (MST)
- Agree. That might require a change of level header (i.e., L3 -> L4), since all the sidebars/ boxes/ inserts have been level 3 that I've seen, but hardly a big deal. For The Contested Isle I've been using
{| class=wikitable | ===Title=== text text, etc. |}