Talk:Tribunal Book: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 13:01, 27 July 2013

Which are the Tribunal Books?

Does Land of Fire and Ice qualify? What about Ultima Thule, Cradle and Crescent?

Why not just add them as a separate list, after the main one? "In addition, the following books cover territories that are not part of the standard tribunals:".... It's not like we're going to build a special page for "regional books that are not tribunal books", and people looking for Land of Fire and Ice are very likely to think of it as a tribunal book. Yair (talk) 08:34, 26 July 2013 (MDT)

That sure makes sense. LuisDantas (talk) 14:17, 26 July 2013 (MDT)

Agreed. I don't know about just labelling them "tribunal sourcebook" in the list of products because they're not quite, but they should certainly be listed and explained in a page like this. IMHO (talk) 14:01, 27 July 2013 (MDT)

Revision as of 13:17, 26 July 2013 (view source) LuisDantas (talk \| contribs) (→‎Which are the Tribunal Books?) ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 13:01, 27 July 2013 (view source) IMHO (talk \| contribs) (→‎Which are the Tribunal Books?)
Line 5:		Line 5:

	:That sure makes sense. [[User:LuisDantas\|LuisDantas]] ([[User talk:LuisDantas\|talk]]) 14:17, 26 July 2013 (MDT)		:That sure makes sense. [[User:LuisDantas\|LuisDantas]] ([[User talk:LuisDantas\|talk]]) 14:17, 26 July 2013 (MDT)

			::Agreed. I don't know about just labelling them "tribunal sourcebook" in the list of products because they're not ''quite'', but they should certainly be listed and explained in a page like this. [[User:IMHO\|IMHO]] ([[User talk:IMHO\|talk]]) 14:01, 27 July 2013 (MDT)