Summa: Difference between revisions

From Project: Redcap
(Importing text file)
 
(→‎Errata: We don't seem to have a quote template, so I've used indentation for now. Removed what I presum is prior website coding.)
Line 14: Line 14:
The first printing of [[ArM5]] contained some confusing text about summae that has been clarified by the official [http://www.atlas-games.com/arm5/arm5errata.php | errata].  On page 165, the text in question reads, "Summae: Source - Quality and Level".
The first printing of [[ArM5]] contained some confusing text about summae that has been clarified by the official [http://www.atlas-games.com/arm5/arm5errata.php | errata].  On page 165, the text in question reads, "Summae: Source - Quality and Level".


[begin:.quote]
:Not as clear as it might be, true. The called-out sentences in the left-hand column just give the stats for the books. The words after the colon should not be capped. The rules are the same as for everything else: Advancement Total is based only on Source Quality, not level.
Not as clear as it might be, true. The called-out sentences in the left-hand column just give the stats for the books. The words after the colon should not be capped. The rules are the same as for everything else: Advancement Total is based only on Source Quality, not level.


["--David Chart, Atlas Games Discussion Forums, 11 Feb. 2005]
:::::--David Chart, Atlas Games Discussion Forums, 11 Feb. 2005
[end:.quote]


All the text is really supposed to mean is that summae have two statistics: [[Book Quality | Quality]] and [[Book Level | Level]].  Contrast with [[Tractatus]], which have only a Quality score (no Level).
All the text is really supposed to mean is that summae have two statistics: [[Book Quality | Quality]] and [[Book Level | Level]].  Contrast with [[Tractatus]], which have only a Quality score (no Level).

Revision as of 17:59, 4 December 2012

[begin:.preamble] Each summa is described by two factors: its level, which represents how much knowledge is contained in it, and its quality, representing how well it is written.

["--Ars Magica Fifth Edition, page 165] [end:.preamble]

Synopsis

A summa (plural, summae) in ArM5 is simply a book that can be studied for multiple seasons. They are an important part of most covenants' libraries. Summa may be used to learn any Art or Ability.

Errata

The first printing of ArM5 contained some confusing text about summae that has been clarified by the official | errata. On page 165, the text in question reads, "Summae: Source - Quality and Level".

Not as clear as it might be, true. The called-out sentences in the left-hand column just give the stats for the books. The words after the colon should not be capped. The rules are the same as for everything else: Advancement Total is based only on Source Quality, not level.
--David Chart, Atlas Games Discussion Forums, 11 Feb. 2005

All the text is really supposed to mean is that summae have two statistics: Quality and Level. Contrast with Tractatus, which have only a Quality score (no Level).

Summae in Past Editions

In ArM4, summae were described as books "distilling all that a scholar knows about an Art or Knowledge into a single book." (page 188). The formula for determining the Quality of the summa was somewhat different than in ArM5, but the general rules for studying from them were similar.

In ArM3 and earlier editions, there was only one sort of book. Summae as such did not exist (although all books were similar to summae in that they could be studied for more than one season).

References

  • Studying from summae, ArM5 p. 165
  • Writing summae, ArM5 p. 165
  • Value of summae in a covenant library, ArM5 p. 71

See Also

Legacy Page

The history of this page before August 6, 2010 is archived at Legacy:summa