Talk:House Criamon: Difference between revisions
(→Suggested standard info for listed magi: new section) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Suggested standard info for listed magi == | == Suggested standard info for listed magi == | ||
Okay, we're from standardized here, but for a quick glance, I suggest we at least include include covenant and tribunal info, when known. For this house specifically, publicly known paths they are working on? Maybe the stage they are at? Thoughts? (granted, at the time I write this, we don't even have section listing magi, but hey, best time to work out a standard, amiright)? [[User:IMHO|IMHO]] ([[User talk:IMHO|talk]]) 21:46, 5 June 2015 (MDT) | Okay, we're far from standardized here, but for a quick glance, I suggest we at least include include covenant and tribunal info, when known. For this house specifically, publicly known paths they are working on? Maybe the stage they are at? Thoughts? (granted, at the time I write this, we don't even have a section listing magi, but hey, best time to work out a standard, amiright)? [[User:IMHO|IMHO]] ([[User talk:IMHO|talk]]) 21:46, 5 June 2015 (MDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 20:51, 5 June 2015
Suggested standard info for listed magi
Okay, we're far from standardized here, but for a quick glance, I suggest we at least include include covenant and tribunal info, when known. For this house specifically, publicly known paths they are working on? Maybe the stage they are at? Thoughts? (granted, at the time I write this, we don't even have a section listing magi, but hey, best time to work out a standard, amiright)? IMHO (talk) 21:46, 5 June 2015 (MDT)