Talk:Tribunal Book: Difference between revisions
LuisDantas (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Why not just add them as a separate list, after the main one? "In addition, the following books cover territories that are not part of the standard tribunals:".... It's not like we're going to build a special page for "regional books that are not tribunal books", and people looking for Land of Fire and Ice are very likely to think of it as a tribunal book. [[User:Yair|Yair]] ([[User talk:Yair|talk]]) 08:34, 26 July 2013 (MDT) | Why not just add them as a separate list, after the main one? "In addition, the following books cover territories that are not part of the standard tribunals:".... It's not like we're going to build a special page for "regional books that are not tribunal books", and people looking for Land of Fire and Ice are very likely to think of it as a tribunal book. [[User:Yair|Yair]] ([[User talk:Yair|talk]]) 08:34, 26 July 2013 (MDT) | ||
:That sure makes sense. [[User:LuisDantas|LuisDantas]] ([[User talk:LuisDantas|talk]]) 14:17, 26 July 2013 (MDT) |
Revision as of 13:17, 26 July 2013
Which are the Tribunal Books?
Does Land of Fire and Ice qualify? What about Ultima Thule, Cradle and Crescent?
Why not just add them as a separate list, after the main one? "In addition, the following books cover territories that are not part of the standard tribunals:".... It's not like we're going to build a special page for "regional books that are not tribunal books", and people looking for Land of Fire and Ice are very likely to think of it as a tribunal book. Yair (talk) 08:34, 26 July 2013 (MDT)
- That sure makes sense. LuisDantas (talk) 14:17, 26 July 2013 (MDT)